JHG
SUCCESS
STORIES
Point Firearm, Domestic Threats
Point Firearm, Weapons Dangerous, Utter Threats (Domestic)
R. v. L.S. | 2026 | OSHAWA
Client was charged with a domestic incident after his girlfriend called the police to report that he had threatened her by pointing a firearm at her which she claimed was a real gun. They were both drug users and in a volatile relationship. After being arrested at gunpoint, police searched the house and found only a BB gun. After successfully completing a detox and rehabilitation program, the client moved into a sober living facility and a year after his arrest, the crown agreed to a peace bond and withdrawal of all charges.
Firearm, Ammunition, Cocaine, Fentanyl, Meth, Heroin
Possess firearm, Possess ammunition, and Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking cocaine, fentanyl, meth, and heroin
R. v. R.L. | 2026 | TORONTO SCJ
Police executed a warrant to search my clients home and two vehicles, and found a firearm in one car and drugs in the other. After locating the drugs, and purely out of spite, they dismantled the vehicle — pulling apart the gear box, glove box, and console. We filed a comprehensive Charter application to argue that the basis of the search was unconstitutional and that the manner of search was unreasonable and excessive. After 4 days of evidence, the Crown agreed to withdraw the drug charges and join on a sentence that would allow my client to serve his time at home. After a 5 year battle and much effort on his part to turn his life around to care for and support his daughter as her primary caregiver with full custody, he was sentenced on the gun to 18 months of house arrest.
Firearm, Breach Prohibition Order + Recognizance
Possession of a firearm, Possession of a Prohibited device x2, Breach Prohibition Order x3, and Breach of Recognizance x11
R. v. G.L. | 2026 | NEWMARKET
Client was targeted by the YRP Bail Compliance Unit for 3 months before they arrested him for 11 counts of breaching his bail. All of the breaches were for being out without his surety or possessing a cell phone. Before being taken into custody and with their permission, he gave his satchel and his watch to his mother and then complied with all of their demands. He was searched incident to arrest and nothing unlawful was located. Once he was safely secured in the cruiser, they decided to search the satchel and found a loaded restricted firearm with extended clip and auto switch attached. After 3 days of evidence and some very contentious arguments, the judge agreed that the search was an unconstitutional violation of is rights and excluded the firearm and accessories in the satchel.
Domestic Assault, Firearms
R. v. R.Z. | 2025 | NEWMARKET
Client caught his wife cheating after years spent trying to navigate her alcoholism and he decided to end the relationship. After finding a temporary residence and advising her that he was leaving, she called the police and invented a story of prolonged and historical domestic abuse. The client was arrested, his legal firearms were seized, and his son was removed from his care. From the first conversation with the crown, we offered a peace bond to keep the couple apart. The crown instead wanted a jail sentence. It took 26 months to get to trial and on day 2 of 5, after the complainant was caught lying on the stand and admitting to perjury, the Crown changed their position and agreed to a peace bond for a withdrawal of all of the charges.
Firearms, Fentanyl
Possession of a Firearm, and Fentanyl
R. v. R.L. | 2025 | HAMILTON
Client charged with a firearm found in the back of his friends vehicle after they both fell asleep in the car, parked on a residential street. The Crown withdrew the firearm charges after months of negotiation but the feds pursued serious drug charges as the police alleged that the client discarded the drugs while handcuffed in the back of the cruiser. It took a charter application challenging the initial detention and arrest, combined with the police failure to provide rights to counsel, but after a two year battle we were ultimately successful in having all charges stayed.
Firearm Possession
R. v. E.P.C. | 2025 | TORONTO
Client tried to sleep off a night of partying in the front seat of his vehicle and ended up arrested for impaired driving. The police conducted an inventory search of the car before towing it, and a loaded handgun was found in the back seat, in a satchel, containing the client’s passport. After a 4 day trial in Ontario Court, the client was acquitted when the Crown failed to prove that he had knowledge and control of the gun in the car.
Firearms, Fentanyl, Cocaine
Possession of a Firearm, Fentanyl, and Cocaine for the Purpose of Trafficking
R. v. J.B.A | 2025 | NEWMARKET
Client was the subject of an 11 month police investigation in which he was “flagged” on a police database as someone who should be investigated for drug charges. As a result of the flag on his file, police in 3 jurisdictions conducted roadside stops to investigate him on 7 different occasions. Each stop was a violation of the client’s constitutional rights, as he was never told the true purpose and never informed of his right to remain silent or provided with the opportunity to speak to a lawyer. Ultimately, his vehicle and home were the subject of a search warrant where police located a loaded handgun, a quantity of cocaine, fentanyl, meth, and cash; all of which become the subject of a successful Charter Application that ended the prosecution with a stay of all charges and a forfeiture order that returned the client’s seized cash.
Firearm Possession
R. v. A.V.D. | 2025 | HAMILTON
After a very short period of surveillance, the police obtained a warrant to search for a firearm at the client’s apartment. They arrested him down the street and asked incriminating questions prior to providing him his rights to counsel. Despite a series of constitutional issues, his first lawyer set a trial challenging only his possession of the firearm and not the Charter violations committed by the police. Shortly before his trial, he questioned the lawyer’s strategy and ultimately terminated the relationship. We took a different approach and focused on the police misconduct: the failure to investigate the client, the lack of connection between the alleged crime and the residence, the failure to provide rights to counsel, and the failure to hold off questioning. We filed our Application and the Crown promptly withdrew all charges.
Firearms
R. v. O.Y. | 2025 | TORONTO
The client was charged with a list of firearms offences after he made the “mistake” of walking through the Entertainment District of Toronto on a Friday night, sparking the suspicions of security guard at Ruby Soho, who alerted a cop, who then illegally detained and searched the clients satchel, finding a firearm and full clip inside. Two years later, 6 Trial Dates, and two Charter Applications later, the client was acquitted. Read the decision at the link below.
Firearm Possession
R. v. A.M. | 2024 | TORONTO
Client came to me with three interconnected cases. The police had been investigating his Instagram account and executed a search warrant on a residence he had ties to looking to seize his devices (phone, computer, tablets, etc.). In addition to locating electronics, they also found a gun inside a satchel, inside a closet, in the bedroom the client had been sleeping in. After beating both cases related to his Instagram account (one the crown withdrew and the other we won at trial), we successfully defended the gun charges when the Crown failed to establish he had knowledge of the firearm. After three long years on restrictive bail conditions, he finally cut off the ankle monitor and remains without a criminal record.
Loaded Firearm
R. v. R.C. | 2024 | OSHAWA
Client was charged with a loaded firearm found in the back seat of his vehicle after being pulled over by police for being a black man driving a Mercedes in Oshawa. Despite the judge finding that the search of the vehicle was illegal, she would not exclude the firearm from the trial. During the Charter Application however, the jail repeatedly failed to bring my client to court, delaying the matter by 3 months. I argued that the delays violated the client’s constitutional right to a trial in a reasonable amount of time and that the charges should be stayed. This argument was successful and as a result all charges were stayed.
Assault with a Weapon, Noxious Substance, Mischief
R. v. J.M.W | 2024 | COBOURG
Assault with a weapon x2, Possess weapon x2, Administer noxious substance x2, and Mischief over $5000 x2
After a short but contentious trial with two lying complainants, my client was acquitted of all charges. From the day he hired me, he was adamant that the alleged victims were lying about the altercation and after 3 days of cross examinations it was clear to everyone in the courtroom that their stories were not to be believed.
Kidnapping, Robbery, Firearms, Assault
Kidnapping, Robbery with a firearm, Possession of a firearm, Forcible confinement, Assault causing bodily harm.
R. v. K.W. | 2024 | BRANTFORD
The client came to me after representing himself for almost a year and getting nowhere with the crown. He knew his rights had been violated when the police arrested him sleeping in his car but he could not articulate how. It took us 6 months to receive the police body cams which showed that the cops had him under investigation for nearly 40 minutes without giving him his Rights to Counsel and during that time they forced him to create the basis for his own arrest by having him turn on the vehicle to show he had control of it while visibly impaired. After taking the Crown through the series of charter breaches he realized there was no public interest in proceeding and withdrew the charges immediately.
P4P Fentanyl, Proceeds, and Possess Firearm
R. v. J.T. | 2024 | Hamilton
Sadly I was not able to cross examine the lead officer on this very illegal arrest and subsequent search of a vehicle wherein police located a loaded handgun and 3 ounces of fentanyl. After filing our charter application challenging the officer’s actions, both the federal crown and provincial crown withdrew all charges.
Fentanyl, Cocaine, Meth and Weapons Possession
Possession for the purpose of trafficking fentanyl, cocaine, and meth, Possess weapon x3, Proceeds of crime.
R. v. J.P. | 2024 | Toronto
The client was the target of a search warrant in which there were four separate confidential informants but almost no investigation conducted by the police to corroborate their sources. When the warrant was executed, the police found almost an ounce each of fentanyl, cocaine, and meth both on him and in his room, in addition to finding an air pistol, knife, and a baton. We set a six-day trial and filed a Charter Application challenging both the warrant and the police failure to call his lawyer immediately upon arrest. It was all we had, given the fact that the drugs and weapons were found on him and in the room his family (who were home at the time) identified as his. After reading our Application, however, the Crown recognized we both had risks at trial and offered to resolve with a plea to the cocaine and meth for a conditional sentence of two years; withdrawing the fentanyl count (which would have attracted a 4-5 year sentence on its own) and all of the weapons charges and the client will never see the inside of a cell.
Fentanyl, Cocaine, Heroin, Percs, and Firearms
Possession for the purpose of trafficking fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and percs; Possession of a loaded restricted firearm, Possession of a prohibited device (switches) x5, Proceeds of crime.
R. v. F.A. | 2023 | Toronto
This trial was set for 15 days over a one year period, with a series of Charter challenges to 18 different search warrants and a police investigation spanning 3 cities. Two hours into what was scheduled for two days of cross examining the Affiant, the Crown recognized the serious deficiencies with the warrant and the less-than-honest officer who prepared it. After he admitted to submitting an affidavit he had sworn to be true but knew to be false, the Crown withdrew all charges.
Cocaine, Oxys, Ketamine, Adderall, LSD
Possession for the purpose of trafficking cocaine, oxys, ketamine, Adderall, and LSD.
R. v. M.R. | 2022 | ST. CATHARINES
Our client was the target of a drug investigation that culminated in three warrants being executed and a variety of substances, cash, and cell phones seized. It took almost 20 months and an extensive Charter Application challenging the warrants into his apartment and vehicles but on the first day of the application, the Crown withdrew all charges and the client remains free of any criminal record.
Fentanyl, Possession of Ammunition
Possession for the purpose of trafficking fentanyl and possession of ammunition.
R. v. T.G-F | 2021 | TORONTO
Client was charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking fentanyl (later confirmed as also including carfentanyl, cocaine, and heroin) and over 200 rounds of ammunition after police executed a search warrant at a residence they believed was his. After a successful challenge to the warrant, the Judge decided that the police had mislead the issuing justice and excluded all of the evidence; and my client was acquitted of all counts. Read the judges reasons below:
Attempted Murder, Robbery With Firearm, Aggravated Assault
Attempted Murder, robbery with firearm, discharge firearm, aggravated assault, careless use, and weapons dangerous.
R. v. C.W | 2021 | TORONTO
The client brought his legally registered handgun to a drug deal and, after a dispute, left the dealer with three gunshot wounds to the abdomen. The client was released on bail within days and has spent the last three years turning his life around (rehab, university, employment, counseling). As a result, he will never see the inside of a cell. His legal battle ended with a plea to aggravated assault and careless use for a two-year sentence to be served in the community.
Firearms, Cocaine, Heroin, Fentanyl
Possession of a loaded restricted firearm, possession for the purpose of trafficking cocaine, heroin, and fentanyl, proceeds of crime, fail to comply with recognizance.
R. v. L.N | 2021 | MIDLAND
Client acquitted of all charges following an 8 day battle, where I argued that my client was racially profiled and investigated for no other reason than being a black man driving through Midland. The investigation led to his unlawfully arrest and search of the trunk of his car where the drugs and gun were located. The judge agreed with my arguments and excluded all evidence and even acquitted on the breach of bail because “but for the racial profiling, Mr. N would never have been identified to the police or become the subject of their investigation”.
This decision is well worth the read: (see below)